— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 28, 2025
from Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law https://x.com/StraffiStraffi/status/1961023527257022954
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 28, 2025
No one gets into a marriage with the expectation of getting divorced. However, statistics show that nearly half of all marriages end in divorce.https://t.co/3WFndt8Tif pic.twitter.com/7iNmorJbKM
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 28, 2025
Denise Richards Breaks Her Silence on Ongoing Divorce from Ex Aaron Phypers: 'It Makes Me Want to Cry'https://t.co/61l6kfENMy
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 28, 2025
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 21, 2025
Millions of student loan borrowers may be headed for default: Here’s who’s most at risk—and how to avoid ithttps://t.co/gBtOBxKaH0
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 21, 2025
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 20, 2025
New Jersey Real Estate Company Files for Chapter 11 Amid Market Challengeshttps://t.co/2eJ4YZZmiC
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 20, 2025
The most significant consequence of the automatic stay in a New Jersey divorce is that it freezes the equitable distribution of marital property. https://t.co/uraUkyY2wK pic.twitter.com/dBPdUXH0Zr
— Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law (@StraffiStraffi) August 20, 2025
Going through a divorce is challenging enough on its own, but when combined with overwhelming debt and the possibility of filing for bankruptcy, the situation becomes far more complicated. If you’re dealing with both divorce and financial hardship in New Jersey, it’s important to understand how these two legal processes affect each other. From automatic stays to the division of marital assets and debts, timing and planning play a crucial role. Filing bankruptcy during a divorce is not just a financial move; it can significantly influence your property rights, support obligations, and the overall resolution of your case.
Because New Jersey’s bankruptcy and family laws overlap in intricate ways, working with an experienced New Jersey bankruptcy attorney is essential. The right legal guidance can help you protect your interests, avoid costly missteps, and chart the most effective path forward. If you’re considering bankruptcy during your divorce, contact Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law at (732) 341-3800 to schedule a consultation. Our team is ready to help you move toward financial stability with confidence.
The moment a bankruptcy petition is filed, a powerful legal injunction known as the automatic stay takes effect. This provision of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code immediately halts most creditor collection activities, including lawsuits, wage garnishments, and foreclosure proceedings. When someone is in the middle of a divorce, the automatic stay can significantly alter the course and timing of the family court process in New Jersey.
The most significant consequence of the automatic stay in a New Jersey divorce is that it freezes the equitable distribution of marital property. Once bankruptcy is filed, all of the debtor’s assets, including their share of the marital estate, become part of what’s called the bankruptcy estate. This estate falls under the exclusive authority of the bankruptcy trustee and court.
Because of this, state family court judges are legally barred from dividing assets or debts while the stay is in effect. This means the court cannot:
Until the stay is lifted or the bankruptcy concludes, the financial components of the divorce are essentially paused.
While the automatic stay has a broad scope, it does not entirely halt all aspects of a divorce. The Bankruptcy Code makes explicit exceptions for key family law issues, allowing certain proceedings to move forward even after a bankruptcy is filed:
These exemptions ensure that important family protections and obligations are not delayed.
Although some aspects of a divorce are allowed to continue, many New Jersey family court judges choose to pause the entire divorce case until the bankruptcy is resolved or the stay is formally lifted. This is largely because issues like alimony and child support are often tied to the financial picture established through property division. Proceeding with one part while the other is frozen can be inefficient or lead to inconsistent outcomes.
To move forward with equitable distribution during an active bankruptcy, one party must file a motion in bankruptcy court asking the judge to lift the stay. In New Jersey, these motions are often granted, as bankruptcy judges typically defer to the state family court’s experience in matrimonial matters. Still, this step adds legal complexity, time, and expense.
The type of bankruptcy filed also impacts the divorce timeline. As a result, choosing between Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 becomes not just a financial decision about debt relief but also a strategic consideration that affects the timing and cost of the divorce itself.
Daniel Straffi, Jr., Esq. is a seasoned New Jersey bankruptcy lawyer with over two decades of legal experience. Admitted to practice in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and the District Court of New Jersey since 2001, Mr. Straffi brings a deep understanding of financial relief strategies for individuals and businesses. After clerking for the Presiding Judge of Family Law in Mercer County, he worked in negligence defense before joining his family’s law firm, where he has since focused on bankruptcy, divorce, and criminal defense.
A graduate of Boston College and Rutgers-Camden School of Law, Mr. Straffi is known for his practical approach and client-centered service. He is an active member of the New Jersey and Ocean County Bar Associations, where he co-chairs the Bankruptcy Panel. As a certified mediator and early settlement panelist in Ocean County, he offers clients both skilled litigation and effective negotiation options for resolving financial hardship.
Beyond the immediate effects of the automatic stay, one of the most critical strategic decisions a divorcing couple must make is when to file for bankruptcy. There is no one-size-fits-all answer. The best timing depends on a couple’s financial situation, the structure and ownership of their debts, the value and nature of their assets, and, most importantly, their ability to cooperate. The main choice is whether to file before the divorce is finalized or to wait until after. Each route offers unique advantages and potential complications.
For couples who can cooperate, filing a joint bankruptcy before the divorce is finalized can provide several key benefits. This approach addresses the debt burden upfront, setting the stage for a smoother and less contentious divorce.
The Strategic Advantages
The Potential Pitfalls
Category | Details | Impact |
---|---|---|
Cost Savings & Efficiency | Filing jointly avoids duplicate court and attorney fees; the process is streamlined into one case. | Reduces total legal expenses and simplifies the bankruptcy process. |
Asset Protection | Joint filers in New Jersey can double bankruptcy exemptions, such as the federal homestead exemption for primary residence. | Protects more property, allowing a couple to retain greater equity in their assets. |
Simplified Divorce | Discharging joint unsecured debts (e.g., credit cards, medical bills) leads to fewer financial disputes during divorce. | Eases negotiation and division of assets, reducing conflict and making divorce smoother. |
Means Test Challenge | Joint income may exceed the Chapter 7 qualification threshold, requiring a switch to a Chapter 13 repayment plan. | Limits access to quick debt relief through Chapter 7. |
Need for Cooperation | Both spouses must fully disclose finances and attend required proceedings like creditor meetings. | Difficult for high-conflict couples; lack of cooperation may derail the process. |
Risk to Non-Exempt Assets | Valuable joint assets not fully covered by exemptions (e.g., vacation homes, large investments) can be liquidated by a trustee. | Reduces marital estate before the divorce court can equitably divide assets. |
Choosing to file for bankruptcy after the divorce provides greater independence but introduces its own set of challenges, especially concerning joint debts.
The Strategic Advantages
The Potential Pitfalls
The best way to avoid the joint debt trap is to deal with joint debts during the divorce itself. This may involve selling property to pay off liabilities, refinancing loans into one spouse’s name, or closing shared accounts. Relying on “hold harmless” clauses in divorce judgments is risky when bankruptcy is even a remote possibility.
The second critical decision for individuals facing both divorce and financial distress is which type of bankruptcy to file. The two most common forms of personal bankruptcy, Chapter 7 and Chapter 13, offer very different processes, timelines, and consequences. For someone going through a divorce, this choice is not just about debt relief. The choice of bankruptcy type to pursue can significantly impact the outcome of asset division, property settlement obligations, and future financial stability.
Chapter 7 bankruptcy is often referred to as a “liquidation” bankruptcy because it involves a court-appointed trustee selling off the debtor’s non-exempt assets to repay creditors. In return, most unsecured debts such as credit cards, medical bills, and personal loans are discharged, giving the filer a clean slate.
How it Works: The process is relatively simple and fast. After filing, the debtor attends a meeting of creditors. If there are no objections or complications, the bankruptcy court typically issues a discharge order within a few months. In New Jersey, many filers retain all their property because their assets are protected by state or federal exemptions.
Timeline: The entire process generally takes between three to six months from the date of filing.
Who It’s For: Chapter 7 is ideal for individuals whose income falls below the state median and who pass the means test. It is best suited for those with limited non-exempt property and whose goal is to eliminate dischargeable debts as quickly and completely as possible.
Key Divorce Implication: Under Section 523(a)(15) of the Bankruptcy Code, debts owed to a current or former spouse that arise from a divorce—particularly those related to property settlements or equitable distribution—cannot be discharged in Chapter 7. For example, if a divorce judgment orders one spouse to make a payment to the other to equalize the division of marital assets, that debt will survive the bankruptcy and remain legally enforceable.
Chapter 13 bankruptcy is a reorganization plan rather than a liquidation. Instead of selling assets, the debtor proposes a court-approved plan to repay all or a portion of their debts over three to five years. This plan is funded through a single monthly payment made to a Chapter 13 trustee, who distributes the funds to creditors according to the plan’s terms.
How it Works: The debtor retains all of their property, even if some of it is not protected by exemptions. Chapter 13 is commonly used to stop foreclosure and catch up on mortgage arrears, or for individuals whose income is too high to qualify for Chapter 7.
Timeline: The repayment plan must last a minimum of three years and can extend up to five years, depending on the filer’s income and financial situation.
Who It’s For: Chapter 13 is suitable for people with a steady income who either do not qualify for Chapter 7 or want to preserve valuable non-exempt assets. It also works well for those who need time to manage or restructure certain debts.
Key Divorce Implication: One of the most important distinctions of Chapter 13 is the “super-discharge” provision. This allows for the discharge of certain types of debt that are non-dischargeable in Chapter 7, including debts arising from property settlements and equitable distribution in divorce.
This creates a strategic dynamic in divorce planning. For example, a spouse who is ordered to make a large cash payment to their ex-spouse as part of a property settlement might be able to eliminate that obligation later by filing for Chapter 13. The receiving spouse’s main protection is to work with a knowledgeable attorney who ensures that any such payments are characterized in the divorce decree as “alimony” or “support.” These types of obligations are non-dischargeable in both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13.
Beyond the core strategy of deciding when and how to file for bankruptcy during a divorce, several advanced legal risks and technical pitfalls can significantly affect the outcome. These often-overlooked issues can derail carefully laid plans and result in financial harm long after the divorce is finalized. Understanding and planning for them is essential.
It is common for divorcing couples to attempt informal settlements before filing for bankruptcy. For example, one spouse might transfer the title of a car or give a sum of money from a joint account with the understanding that this settles their share of the marital estate. Although this may seem fair and cooperative, it carries serious legal risks.
Bankruptcy trustees have the authority to reverse certain financial transactions made before the bankruptcy filing. This includes a “look-back” period of at least one year for transfers involving insiders, such as a current or former spouse. If the trustee determines that an asset was transferred for less than reasonably equivalent value or with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors, the transaction can be considered a fraudulent conveyance.
In such cases, the trustee may sue to recover the asset or its equivalent value for the benefit of creditors. The couple’s informal agreement or good intentions do not matter. A car, cash transfer, or other property settlement made prior to the bankruptcy can be legally unwound, disrupting what both spouses may have believed was a final and fair resolution.
One of the most serious risks following a divorce is the “phantom debt” problem. This occurs when one spouse discharges a joint debt through bankruptcy, leaving the creditor free to pursue the other spouse for the full remaining balance. A well-drafted indemnification clause in the divorce settlement can provide strong protection.
This clause establishes a new and independent legal obligation. If one spouse (Spouse A) is assigned a joint debt but fails to pay it for any reason, including bankruptcy, and the creditor then collects from the other spouse (Spouse B), the clause requires Spouse A to reimburse Spouse B for any amounts paid, including legal fees.
Courts often treat these indemnification obligations as being in the nature of support. This classification can make the obligation non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, similar to alimony or child support. A properly written indemnification clause can convert a third-party debt into a continuing personal obligation, providing one of the most effective ways to protect a client from future financial harm caused by a former spouse’s bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy and divorce both raise complicated tax issues that can become even more complex when they occur together. These consequences are frequently overlooked until it is too late.
While discharged debt is typically not considered taxable income, the transfer or sale of assets during divorce can create unexpected tax liabilities. For example, dividing retirement accounts without using a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) may lead to penalties or taxable events. Selling the marital home could also trigger capital gains tax, depending on how and when the sale occurs.
In addition, bankruptcy-related asset liquidation or debt restructuring may affect tax deductions or credits. Consulting with professionals who understand both the legal and tax implications is essential. Without proper guidance, parties may find themselves facing costly tax bills that could have been avoided with advance planning.
Filing for bankruptcy during a divorce in New Jersey involves more than just filling out paperwork. It requires careful coordination, informed decision-making, and a clear understanding of how each legal process influences the other. Whether you’re trying to discharge overwhelming debt, protect key assets, or ensure a fair divorce settlement, the choices you make now will have lasting financial and legal consequences.
If you’re facing this challenging intersection of divorce and bankruptcy, don’t go it alone. The experienced team of New Jersey bankruptcy attorneys at Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law can guide you through every step with clarity and compassion. Call (732) 341-3800 today to schedule a confidential consultation and take the first step toward securing a stable financial future.
Understanding the nuances of wage garnishment procedures in New Jersey following a court judgment is essential for anyone facing or potentially facing such a situation. Receiving a garnishment order can be distressing and disrupt your financial stability. This is where the guidance of a knowledgeable attorney becomes invaluable.
Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law offers comprehensive legal assistance that can help individuals understand the specific timelines and procedures involved in wage garnishment in New Jersey. Our experienced team of New Jersey bankruptcy lawyers can provide clear insight and sound advice on your legal options. We can also assist in other debt-related concerns, such as the implications of the statute of limitations on debt for NJ residents.
If you’re dealing with a garnishment order or seeking to understand your rights and responsibilities after a court judgment, reaching out to Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law can be a decisive step towards managing your situation effectively. Contact us at (732) 341-3800 today to learn how we can assist you in addressing wage garnishment issues and securing your financial future.
Wage garnishment is a legal procedure in which an employer withholds a portion of an employee’s earnings to pay the employee’s debt. This process is typically initiated by a court order or government agency action, and the employer is required to send the deducted amount directly to the creditor or the agency owed.
The reasons for wage garnishment can include unpaid taxes, defaulted student loans, child support arrears, alimony, and other consumer debts. The amount that can be garnished from wages is governed by federal and state laws, which set limits on the percentage of disposable income that can be taken from an employee’s paycheck. These laws also provide certain protections to ensure that individuals have enough income left to meet basic living expenses.
Wage garnishment is initiated when a creditor obtains a court order that directs an employer to withhold a specified portion of an employee’s earnings. This is typically the end result of a creditor winning a lawsuit regarding a debt.
In New Jersey, the process is strictly regulated. The amount that can be garnished from an employee’s wages is determined by several factors, including the type of debt and the debtor’s earnings level. This legal tool is primarily used for the recovery of outstanding debts such as credit card bills, medical expenses, child support, and student loans.
While federal laws provide a baseline for wage garnishment processes, New Jersey statutes offer additional protections and stipulations. For example, under federal law, the maximum amount that can be garnished from an individual’s wages for debts like child support or alimony can reach up to 60%, depending on various conditions. However, New Jersey law places more stringent limitations on garnishment to further shield debtors and ensure they are not overly burdened by debt recovery actions.
In New Jersey, up to 25% of a person’s salary can be garnished but up to 50% may be garnished for child support
Moreover, New Jersey provides specific carve-outs and exemptions that are not uniformly present under federal law. While a substantial portion of your salary may be subject to garnishment, there are limitations in place to protect your ability to cover essential monthly expenses such as rent and food. Furthermore, certain types of income are exempt from garnishment. For instance, military pay for members of the armed forces cannot be garnished. Nonetheless, wage garnishment can greatly impact your financial situation, potentially affecting your standard of living.
In New Jersey, not all debts can trigger wage garnishment. Debts can generally be classified into a few key types: consumer debts, tax obligations, and child support payments, each subject to different garnishment rules. Here they are listed in order of priority:
This prioritization ensures that the most critical obligations, particularly those tied to family welfare and government dues, are satisfied first.
Debt Type | Priority & Requirement | Garnishment Limit / Notes for NJ |
---|---|---|
Child Support and Alimony | These are given the highest priority. Garnishment for child support can take a larger percentage of disposable income. | Up to 50% if supporting another spouse or child; up to 60% if not. If more than 12 weeks in arrears, up to 55% or 65% respectively. |
Tax Debts | Federal or state tax authorities do not need a court judgment to initiate wage garnishment. Next in line after child support. | Can be garnished without a court order. Not subject to the usual Consumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA) limits; specific exempt amounts apply based on IRS/state tables. |
Consumer Debts | Includes credit cards, medical bills, and personal loans such as student loans. Requires a court judgment. | Generally limited to the lesser of 25% of disposable earnings or the amount above 30× the federal minimum wage. New Jersey further caps at 10% of disposable income if at or below 250% of the federal poverty level, or 25% if above. |
In New Jersey, both federal and state laws set guidelines on the limits of wage garnishment. Under federal regulations, a judgment creditor is allowed to garnish the lesser amount of:
Here, “disposable earnings” mean the wages remaining after your employer has executed the legally required deductions.
Specific provisions under New Jersey law include an exemption of $48 (N.J. Stat. § 2A:17-50). Additionally, the state law limits the garnishment amounts as follows:
Furthermore, certain types of income are protected from garnishment in New Jersey. Exempt categories include:
Understanding these protections helps safeguard specific income sources from being garnished, thereby maintaining the financial stability of individuals and families affected by potential garnishment actions.
The process of initiating wage garnishment in New Jersey is a formal procedure that involves several crucial steps and the participation of various parties, including creditors, courts, and employers.
In New Jersey, the process for a creditor to obtain a garnishment order starts with securing a judgment against the debtor. Once the creditor has a legally recognized claim, they must then petition the court for a writ of garnishment. This legal document authorizes the debtor’s employer to withhold a portion of the debtor’s earnings. The petition must clearly outline the amount owed and provide evidence of the judgment to ensure the court grants the writ. It is essential for creditors to follow procedural guidelines meticulously to avoid delays.
The role of New Jersey courts is central to the wage garnishment process. After receiving the creditor’s petition, the court reviews the documentation to confirm the validity of the debt and the judgment. If the court finds the claim valid and all legal criteria satisfied, it will issue the writ of garnishment. The court also ensures that all legal limits on wage garnishment, such as the maximum allowable percentage of wages that can be garnished, are adhered to, protecting the debtor’s rights to a certain extent.
Once the writ of garnishment is issued, the employer plays a critical role in the garnishment process. New Jersey law requires the employer to notify the employee of the garnishment promptly. This notification must include information about the garnishment order, the amount to be garnished, and the employee’s rights, including any potential exemptions and how to contest the garnishment.
Employers must comply with the garnishment order by withholding the specified amount from the employee’s wages and remitting it directly to the creditor. Failure to comply can result in legal penalties for the employer. Moreover, the employer is prohibited from retaliating against the employee due to the garnishment, further protecting the employee from unfair employment practices.
In New Jersey, understanding the timeline for initiating wage garnishment after a court judgment is crucial for both creditors and debtors. Once a creditor secures a judgment against a debtor in New Jersey, they are legally entitled to pursue wage garnishment as a means of debt recovery.
Here is a summarized timeline emphasizing the key phases in the wage garnishment process:
This timeline provides an overview of the steps involved from the initial missed payment to the implementation of a wage garnishment order, highlighting the legal and procedural milestones throughout the process.
Several factors can influence the timeline of wage garnishment in New Jersey. These include:
Understanding these factors is essential for both creditors and debtors as they prepare for the financial implications of wage garnishment. It provides a clearer perspective on what to expect in terms of timing and allows parties to plan accordingly.
Daniel Straffi, Jr. is a seasoned bankruptcy attorney serving individuals and businesses throughout New Jersey. A graduate of Boston College and Rutgers-Camden School of Law, he began his legal journey clerking for the Hon. Lee Forrester, P.J.F.P., in Mercer County. He then honed his litigation skills in negligence defense before joining his family’s firm in 2004, where he has since dedicated his practice to bankruptcy, divorce, and criminal defense.
As Co-Chair of the Bankruptcy Panel of the Ocean County Bar Association and a certified mediator, Mr. Straffi is recognized for his leadership and commitment to legal excellence. His practice focuses on guiding clients through complex financial challenges with clarity and compassion. Mr. Straffi combines legal acumen with a genuine commitment to his clients’ financial recovery and future stability.
Daniel Straffi, Sr. has practiced bankruptcy law in New Jersey since 1976, with a primary focus on Chapter 7 and Chapter 11 cases. He serves as a Trustee in bankruptcy for the District of New Jersey and has been appointed as a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Trustee.
A member of the National Association of Bankruptcy Trustees, Mr. Straffi brings decades of experience representing clients in complex bankruptcy matters. He has also contributed to continuing legal education programs and remains active in both federal and state bar associations.
In New Jersey, individuals facing wage garnishment have specific legal rights and protections designed to mitigate undue hardship. In addition to exemptions, there are several legal options available to debtors to challenge or terminate a wage garnishment order.
Debtors in New Jersey have the right to contest a garnishment order if they believe it was wrongfully obtained or calculated incorrectly. The challenge process typically involves filing a motion in the court that issued the original garnishment order. The debtor must present evidence supporting their claim, such as demonstrating an improper calculation of the garnishment amount or proving that the income is exempt. A successful challenge can result in the reduction or elimination of the garnishment.
Filing for bankruptcy is a powerful tool for individuals seeking relief from severe debt burdens, including stopping wage garnishment. When a debtor files for bankruptcy in New Jersey, an automatic stay is immediately enacted. This stay halts all collection activities, including wage garnishment, as long as the stay is in effect. This can provide crucial relief for debtors as they work through the bankruptcy process.
Both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcies can stop wage garnishment. However, the specifics of how long the garnishment is halted depend on the type of bankruptcy filed and the nature of the debt. For instance, while a bankruptcy filing can stop most garnishments, it may not affect garnishments for child support or alimony.
The statute of limitations on debt plays a crucial role in determining how long a creditor or debt collector has to take legal action against a borrower. Once this period expires, the collector loses the legal authority to sue for repayment. Consequently, they cannot secure a court order that would enable them to impose or initiate wage garnishment. This statute is designed to prevent debt collectors from pursuing old debts indefinitely, offering a form of protection to consumers.
Understanding these rights and protections is vital for debtors facing wage garnishment in New Jersey. By leveraging these legal tools, individuals can manage or even halt garnishment, thus safeguarding their income and regaining financial stability.
Employers play a vital role in executing wage garnishment orders, serving as the conduit between the court or government agency and the employee. When an employer fails to comply with a valid garnishment order, the consequences can be serious. This affects not just the employee, but the employer as well.
Once an employer receives a garnishment order, they are legally required to acknowledge it, typically within 10 days. This acknowledgment ensures that the employer understands their responsibilities and intends to comply with the order. Failure to respond can result in a court deeming the employer uncooperative or even negligent.
The penalties for ignoring garnishment orders vary by jurisdiction. One of the most significant risks is that the employer may become liable for the employee’s debt. According to the Bureau of Fiscal Service, if an employer fails to withhold and remit wages as instructed, they may be held financially responsible for the full amount of the garnishment. This could mean repaying thousands of dollars, depending on the nature and size of the debt.
In some cases, courts or administrative agencies may impose fines or other sanctions on employers who violate garnishment laws. These consequences can include:
Employers may also face legal action from the creditor, who could file a lawsuit to recover the owed garnishment amounts.
Proactive financial planning is essential for individuals in New Jersey seeking to prevent wage garnishment. One of the most effective ways to prevent wage garnishment is to address debts before they lead to legal action. Here are key strategies:
Implementing these strategies can significantly reduce the risk of facing a judgment and subsequent wage garnishment.
Legal advice is crucial when dealing with financial disputes that could potentially lead to wage garnishment. Consulting with a knowledgeable attorney can provide several advantages:
Engaging legal counsel early in financial disputes can prevent misunderstandings and ensure that all parties adhere to legal standards.
Debt consolidation and management programs offer structured ways for individuals to regain control of their finances. Benefits of these programs include:
Participation in such programs not only helps in managing debt but also educates individuals on maintaining financial health long-term, potentially preventing future financial distress.
By adopting proactive financial strategies, seeking legal advice when necessary, and considering debt management solutions, individuals in New Jersey can protect their earnings and achieve a more stable financial footing, thereby avoiding the disruptions caused by wage garnishment.
Facing wage garnishment can be a challenging experience, impacting both your financial well-being and peace of mind. With the right legal guidance, you can more effectively manage this situation. At Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law, our attorneys are well-versed in New Jersey’s wage garnishment laws and can help you grasp the timelines and explore your legal options after a court judgment. Don’t let uncertainty about the legal process add to your stress. Contact Straffi & Straffi Attorneys at Law today at (732) 341-3800 to gain clarity and take control of your financial future.